How do you version a review API when the set of answers might grow?

We ship a document-review API from a Go service at Landvex. Today the report is six named dimensions, each verified / deviation / unclear. There is no overall score, and I want to keep it that way.

What I’m not sure about: we may need a seventh question later, or we may need to split one of the six once we understand a document family better.

- Do you treat the dimensions as an extensible list in the JSON (clients must ignore unknown names), or as a closed struct that forces a v2?

- How do you stop an old client from inventing a summary score the moment it sees a list instead of six fixed fields?

- Any Go API design you regretted here — protobuf enums that couldn’t grow, or a map that became a junk drawer?

I’d rather version honestly than paint ourselves into a corner.