You do realize this statement, by itself, declared that you simply don’t bother about human right from the root of all of your crying, right?
You claimed you’re from the first-world, first class, yada yada… but you can’t even do a simple “prove your points” in the debate. All crying.
You claimed that you want to move on to Rust and leave us all, yet here you are, continue crying around.
You claimed that you fight for “all lives” and against racism, yet you just provided a skewed thinking about Rust supporting BLM.
You claimed that I’m a racist person, yet you can’t provide evidence at all that I’m actually am one.
You claimed that you’re debating but here you are, keep forcing me to get involved with the fight with BLM/WLM/ALM foreign matters, ignoring my statement that I’m prohibited to get involved.
You claimed that you approached the proper channel, yet you failed to provide your evidences of efforts (and expect me to do it for you? Did you lie about it or what?)
And now you claim you want to give me a benefit of doubt? Are you serious? Should I loop John Oliver in?
With all the deduction above, it’s good enough to draw a conclusion that you are not, in fact, fighting for any human rights and proven my point that your voices are indeed worthless.
The thing is, you haven’t prove your claims from the start. Just read the thread from the top again: it’s all about muttering, throwing frustrations, commanding people to do what you like, and shoot people for what you dislike. Man, this is kid with daddy issue here.
Let me give you a hint: All I did here messing with you is giving a chance to either redeem yourself or to prove that this forum isn’t as you claimed, by your own action.
I want it to hit deep into the readers of this thread so hard, especially those from the United States, that how barbaric some “gifted” Americans are forcing non-US individuals to get involved in a US-only matter.
I want see how you use your freedom of speech to do a debate and learn more about how American uses their 1st Amendment.
The difference between you and me, is that I speak with data pointers, presenting sources to prove my points and etc so that:
- any readers of this thread can verify my claims is a statement or just a pure malicious opinion.
- as a future learning point.
- to earn trust so that I do not simply claim things or make statement.
If you can’t get this straight from the start, don’t call it a debate. This is probably the main problem why your people shut you out right from the beginning.
TIP: you can’t even get through me, a person from a third-world country as you claimed, in a “debate”, what makes you think you can get toe-to-toe with those champs and brilliant talents from Go central team?
Hahahaha. The country where I’m from, especially being as a minority ethics and been through those toxic political drama since the 1998, you still got a long way to go before being a judge, son.
Anyway, I wish you all the best since my objective is done. Enjoy your crying with others. By the way, fly safe, seriously.